Yolanda Camacho Degurules v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Luis Hernandez-Leguizamo and Lucila Salgado De Hernandez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
833 F.2d 861
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 198786-7353California1,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

833 F.2d 861 Yolanda Camacho DeGURULES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Luis HERNANDEZ-LEGUIZAMO and Lucila Salgado De Hernandez, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 86-7353, 86-7106. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 20, 1987 * . Submission Vacated May 29, 1987. Resubmitted Sept. 10, 1987--86-7353. Oct. 21, 1987--86-7106. Decided Dec. 7, 1987. Manuel J. Monquia, Escondido, Cal., for petitioner Hernandez-Leguizamo. Jan Joseph Bejar, San Diego, Cal., for petitioner DeGurules. Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen., James A. Hunolt, and Donald A. Couvillon, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. Petitions for Review of Orders of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Before KILKENNY, SNEED and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. KILKENNY, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 These two cases have been consolidated on appeal because they raise an identical issue, viz., the retroactivity vel non of a recent amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Secs. 1101 et seq. We review de novo, see Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. Murrey & Son's Co., 824 F.2d 740, 742 (CA9 1987) (question of statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.