Brock v. Shirk

Bad Law
833 F.2d 1326·28 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 625·1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15916
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 198786-4121California3,206 words

Opinion

Opinion

833 F.2d 1326 28 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 625, 107 Lab.Cas. P 34,996 William E. BROCK, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joann SHIRK, individually and doing business as Oregon Meat Cutting School; Frank B. Shirk, individually and doing business as Oregon Meat Cutting School, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-4121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 11, 1987. Decided Dec. 8, 1987. Claire Brady White, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant. Edward N. Fadeley, Fadeley & Fadeley, Eugene, Or., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before WRIGHT, WALLACE and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 This is a case about willfulness, good faith and the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). The Secretary of Labor appeals from the relief, inadequate in his view, that was granted in litigation against violators of FLSA. 2 The trial judge found that employers, then before the court as repeat offenders under FLSA, "knew or had reason to know that [their] employees were working overtime hours without compensation." He also ruled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.