Noble

Noble v. Superior Court CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2021F081597California5,791 words

Opinion

Opinion

Santos, J.

Filed 8/19/21 Noble v. Superior Court CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DESIRAE NOBLE,

F081597

Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 18FL-03280) v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MERCED OPINION

COUNTY,

Respondent;

FORESTT NOBLE,

Real Party in Interest.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate. Shelly Seymour, Judge. Family Violence Appellate Project, Cory Hernandez, Arati Vasan, Jennafer Dorfman, and Erin C. Smith; Morgan Lewis & Bockius, William Peterson, Catherine Eschbach, and Deborah E. Quick, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Archer & Emery and Skye Emery for Real Party in Interest. -ooOoo- Family Code section 30441 establishes a rebuttable presumption that it is not in the child’s best interest to award joint or sole…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.