Charles Aborungong v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 202120-72198California700 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 19 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES ABORUNGONG, No. 20-72198
Petitioner, Agency No. A201-683-235
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 5, 2021** Anchorage, Alaska
Before: WARDLAW, MILLER, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Charles Aborungong petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his
application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and we deny the petition in part and dismiss it in part.
1. Aborungong argues the agency improperly…