Caree Harper v. Otis Wright, II

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 202119-55915California800 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CAREE HARPER, No. 19-55915 20-55509 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01709-RGK v.

OTIS D. WRIGHT II, U.S. District Court MEMORANDUM* Judge, individual and official capacities; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 4, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiff Caree Harper appeals the dismissal of her claims against Judge Otis

Wright and the denial of her motion for leave to amend her complaint.1 We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review de novo the district court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.