Caree Harper v. Otis Wright, II
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 19 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CAREE HARPER, No. 19-55915 20-55509 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01709-RGK v.
OTIS D. WRIGHT II, U.S. District Court MEMORANDUM* Judge, individual and official capacities; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 4, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiff Caree Harper appeals the dismissal of her claims against Judge Otis
Wright and the denial of her motion for leave to amend her complaint.1 We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.