Shepherd

Shepherd v. Altman CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2021B300464California1,876 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 8/19/21 Shepherd v. Altman CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

PAUL SHEPHERD et al., B300464

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC696247) v.

JOSHUA ALTMAN et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David Sotelo, Judge. Affirmed. Manning & Kass, Ellroad, Ramirez, Trester; Frederic W. Trester, Steven J. Renick and Ari L. Markow for Defendants and Appellants. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, Scott J. Leipzig and Nancy S. Fong for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

____________________ Paul and Gigi Shepherd signed a commission agreement with Joshua Altman of the real estate brokerage firm Douglas Elliman. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.