Betuel

Filed 8/19/21 Betuel v. Luma Pictures CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

JONATHAN BETUEL, B297030

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC638231) v.

LUMA PICTURES, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William F. Fahey, Judge. Affirmed. Jasper Law and Bernard C. Jasper for Plaintiff and Appellant. Brown, Neri, Smith & Khan, Ethan J. Brown, Jill R. Glennon and Rowennakete P. Barnes for Defendant and Respondent. Plaintiff Jonathan Betuel and defendant Luma Pictures, Inc. reached a settlement of their claims regarding Betuel’s partial ownership of Luma, in which the parties agreed that Luma would purchase Betuel’s…