Herrington v. County of Sonoma

Good Law
834 F.2d 1488
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 198886-2620California12,202 words

Opinion

Opinion

834 F.2d 1488 10 Fed.R.Serv.3d 693 John S. HERRINGTON, David S. Herrington and Quail Hill Ranch, a partnership, Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SONOMA, Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 86-2620, 86-2728. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 15, 1987. Decided Dec. 24, 1987. As Amended Feb. 10, 1988. Jess S. Jackson, Barbara R. Banke, and Frederik A. Jacobsen, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs/appellees/cross-appellants. James P. Botz, Santa Rosa, Cal., Antonio Cosby-Rossmann, Anita E. Ruud, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant/appellant/cross-appellee. John K. Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen., of the State of Cal., Andrea Sheridan Ordin, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., N. Gregory Taylor, Theodora Berger, Asst. Attys. Gen., Craig C. Thompson, Richard M. Frank, Deputy Attys. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for amicus curiae State of Cal. ex rel. John K. Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen. Michael H. Remy, Sharon E. Duggan, Remy & Thomas, Sacramento, Cal., for Western Sonoma County Rural Alliance. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before CHOY, Senior Circuit Judge, SNEED and TANG, Circuit Judges. CHOY,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.