Steven Cuellar v. J. Soto
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 202114-55005California447 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN CUELLAR, No. 14-55005
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-06036-JFW-FFM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
J. SOTO, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Steven Cuellar appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his
U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, Stancle v. Clay, 692 F.3d 948, 952-53 (9th
Cir. 2012), and we reverse.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In relevant part, the district court concluded that Cuellar was not entitled to
statutory tolling for…