Lance Reberger v. Michael Koehn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 202119-16143California347 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

AUG 20 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LANCE REBERGER, No. 19-16143

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:15-cv-00551-MMD-

CBC

v.

MICHAEL KOEHN, ESP General MEMORANDUM* Practioner; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Lance Reberger appeals pro se from the district

court’s denial of his post-judgment motion for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference and retaliation. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Multnomah County, Or. v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.