In Re Disciplinary Action

Good Law
837 F.2d 869·10 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 462·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 500
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 198886-6591California1,509 words

Opinion

Opinion

837 F.2d 869 56 USLW 2481 , 10 Fed.R.Serv.3d 462 , RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 6853 In re DISCIPLINARY ACTION Raymond P. BOUCHER, Esq., Respondent. Jeremey A. SIGMOND, a/k/a Jerome A. Sigmond, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip E. BROWN; Joseph A. Berg, Benjamin B. Shearer; Paul J. Malapira; Dennis Swanson, Marcus I. Brown; California Chiropractic Association Health Service Foundation Peer Review Committee, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-6591. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 21, 1988. Raymond P. Boucher, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Rick A. Cigel, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Before HALL, NOONAN and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Raymond P. Boucher is a partner in the firm of Sayre, Moreno, Purcell & Boucher, 10351 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 406, Los Angeles, California 90025. On October 14, 1987 this court issued an order to Boucher that he show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on him for misrepresentations made by him as counsel for Jeremy A. Sigmond in the case of Sigmond v. Brown, et al., decided by an opinion disposition of this court on September 18, 1987 [ 828 F.2d 8 ]. Boucher chose not to respond to the order to show…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.