United States v. Michael Gelfuso, Peter John Milano and Luigi Gelfuso

Good Law
838 F.2d 358·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1170
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 1, 198887-5306, 87-5308 and 87-5321California729 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

Michael Gelfuso, Peter John Milano and Luigi Gelfuso appeal from the district court’s orders denying their motions for reconsideration of their pretrial detention orders under the Bail Eeform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3142 . They contend that their continued detention violates due process.

On May 21, 1987, Michael Gelfuso, Peter John Milano and Luigi Gelfuso were indicted in a multi-count indictment charging them with racketeering and loansharking violations, conspiracy and attempt to distribute cocaine, and distribution of cocaine. After detention hearings on the government’s motions, they were ordered detained under the Bail Eeform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3142 . The district court affirmed the detention orders under 18 U.S.C. § 3145 (b), finding that no condition or combination of conditions would reasonably assure the safety of the community. The district court also found Michael Gelfuso and Luigi Gelfuso to be flight risks.

The defendants did not appeal the district court’s denial of their motions for revocation of their detention orders. Instead, they moved the district court three months later for reconsideration of their detention orders, contending that the duration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.