United States v. Raimundo Crespo De Llano, United States of America v. George Antonio Rojas, United States of America v. Justina Garcia Dominguez, United States of America v. Santos Amable Dominguez-Peraza

Good Law
838 F.2d 1006
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 2, 198886-1361California7,480 words

Opinion

Opinion

838 F.2d 1006 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raimundo CRESPO de LLANO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Antonio ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justina GARCIA DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santos Amable DOMINGUEZ-PERAZA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 86-1361, 86-1362, 86-1372 and 86-1373. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1987. Decided Oct. 26, 1987. Amended Feb. 2, 1988. John S. Leonardo, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee. Bertram Polis, Tucson, Ariz., for defendants-appellants Dominguez and Dominguez-Peraza. Scott W. Schlievert, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Rojas. Stephen G. Ralls, South Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Crespo de Llano. Before CHOY, ALARCON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. AMENDED OPINION ALARCON, Circuit Judge: 1 Raimundo Crespo de Llano (Crespo), George Antonio Rojas (Rojas), Justina Garcia Dominguez (Dominguez), and Santos Dominguez-Peraza (Dominguez-Peraza) appeal their judgment of conviction after a jury trial. Crespo, Rojas,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.