Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department

Caution
839 F.2d 621·10 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 791·46 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 287·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1814
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 198886-6198California3,529 words

Opinion

Opinion

839 F.2d 621 46 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 287 , 10 Fed.R.Serv.3d 791 Parviz KARIM-PANAHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT; Daryl E. Gates; City of Los Angeles; Tom Bradley; Sid Mills; Byron E. Young; Henry T. Knopp; Robert Robles; Dean Blidterfeldt; M.F. Lords; Tester Obrymski; Agapito Ramirez; Robert G. Gandy; Tom Knoff, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-6198. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1987. Decided Feb. 16, 1988. Parviz Karim-Panahi, pro per. Richard Helgeson, City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before ALARCON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and AGUILAR, * District Judge. ALARCON, Circuit Judge: I. BACKGROUND 1 Parviz Karim-Panahi (Karim-Panahi) appeals from the judgment of dismissal of his amended complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim. 2 On May 16, 1983, Karim-Panahi was arrested on misdemeanor charges of trespassing, Cal.Penal Code Sec. 602(l), and resisting or obstructing a police officer in the performance of his or her duties, Cal. Penal Code Sec. 148. The arresting officers transported…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.