Clifford Y.C. Lai and Victoria L. Lai v. City and County of Honolulu, a Municipal Corporation

Good Law
841 F.2d 301·1988 WL 17847·18 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20737·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2830
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 198887-1689California903 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

The City and County of Honolulu appeal the district court’s money judgment in favor of the Lais in an inverse condemnation action. In 1975, the City enacted a zoning ordinance, placing restrictions within a designated area on construction more than twenty-five feet above ground level. The purpose was to protect the view of the Punchbowl Crater from the H-l Freeway. The Lais, owners of a development lease, were denied a Certificate of Appropriateness for their proposed high-rise condominiums due to the zoning ordinance. The Lais sued the City, contending that the ordinance constituted a compensable “taking” of their property, and won a judgment in their favor in the district court. We reverse and remand to the district court with instructions to dismiss because the plaintiffs have no “taking” claim which is yet ripe.

In 1971, the Lais purchased their leasehold interest in a 30,000 square foot lot with rental units in Honolulu. The property is located near the Punchbowl Crater, a historic and scenic attraction. In 1974, the Lais entered into an arrangement with a developer, who planned to build condominium apartments in conformance with the existing zoning height limitation of 350…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.