Yehoram Uziel v. the Los Angeles Superior Court

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202120-55554California772 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YEHORAM UZIEL, No. 20-55554

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01458-DSF-JEM v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

NORTH VALLEY DISTRICT

CHATSWORTH COURTHOUSE,

DEPARTMENT F47,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2021**

Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Yehoram Uziel, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) and (3), 28 U.S.C.

§ 1343, and 18 U.S.C. § 242 by the litigants, attorneys, trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.