Yehoram Uziel v. the Los Angeles Superior Court
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
YEHORAM UZIEL, No. 20-55554
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01458-DSF-JEM v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
NORTH VALLEY DISTRICT
CHATSWORTH COURTHOUSE,
DEPARTMENT F47,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 19, 2021**
Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Yehoram Uziel, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) and (3), 28 U.S.C.
§ 1343, and 18 U.S.C. § 242 by the litigants, attorneys, trial…