United States v. Jaime Morales-Dominguez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202120-10392California343 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10392

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:16-cr-01054-CKJ-EJM-1 v.

JAIME MORALES-DOMINGUEZ, AKA MEMORANDUM*

Jaime Morales-Dominquez,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Jaime Morales-Dominguez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 15-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Morales-Dominguez argues that the district court procedurally erred by (1)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). failing to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.