United States v. Charles Granderson, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202120-10407California349 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10407

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:15-cr-00039-LRH-WGC-1 v.

CHARLES EARL GRANDERSON, Jr., MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Charles Earl Granderson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying

his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Granderson contends that the district court erred by relying on U.S.S.G.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1B1.13 as an applicable policy statement. Although we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.