Safe Credit Union v. Diaz CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 2021C092158California2,222 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

Filed 8/23/21 Safe Credit Union v. Diaz CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

SAFE CREDIT UNION, C092158

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and (Super. Ct. No. Appellant, STKCVUOC201813550)

v.

JULIET M. DIAZ,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

Plaintiff and cross-defendant SAFE Credit Union (SAFE) sued defendant and cross-complainant Juliet M. Diaz for an outstanding balance owed by her on a car loan after SAFE repossessed and auctioned the car subject to the loan. Diaz cross complained alleging she and other members of a putative class were victims of SAFE’s unfair debt collection practices. Generally, Diaz alleged SAFE issued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.