Finato

Finato v. Keith A. Fink & Associates

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 2021B303978California8,137 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bendix, J.

Filed 8/23/

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION *

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

CLAUDIA FINATO, B303978

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC126362) v.

KEITH A. FINK & ASSOCIATES

et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Harry Jay Ford III, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Law Offices of Olaf J. Muller and Olaf J. Muller for Defendants and Appellants.

*Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication, with the exception of parts D and E of the Discussion. Law Offices of Larry R. Glazer and Nicolette Glazer for Plaintiff and Respondent. ____________________________ This is the second appeal in this action between plaintiff and respondent Claudia Finato and defendants and appellants Keith A. Fink & Associates (KAF&A), Keith A. Fink, and Sarah Hernandez, plaintiff’s former attorneys. In the first appeal, we affirmed the trial court’s striking of two of plaintiff’s causes of action under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.