W. Gale Willis, Dba Willis Sales Co. v. Champlain Cable Corporation

Good Law
842 F.2d 1139·1988 WL 25060·3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 192·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3729
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 198885-4175California318 words

Opinion

Opinion

Plaintiff Willis appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Champlain Cable Corporation (Champlain). Willis, employed as a manufacturer’s representative by Champlain’s predecessor, Haveg Industries, Inc., was terminated under the terms of an employment contract in September of 1976. It was clear under the contract that Willis was entitled to commissions on sales accepted up to and including the effective date of his termination. This claim, however, pertained to commissions on sales executed after his termination. He contends he was the procuring cause of those sales and that he was terminated in bad faith. Willis argues that a sales agent whose agency contract is terminated in bad faith may recover commissions on agent procured post-termination sales even if that recovery contradicts the terms of the employment contract.

Resolution of this case turned upon issues of Washington law as to which there were substantial grounds for difference of opinion. We therefore certified the question whether Washington state law implied a covenant of good faith and fair dealing that prohibits the principal in a sales agent’s contract from terminating the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.