Rogelio Calderon v. Phuc Lam
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROGELIO CALDERON, No. 20-15731
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:18-cv-04384-KAW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PHUC LAM, Prison Doctor; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted August 17, 2021***
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Rogelio Calderon appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate
indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. We review de…