Rogelio Calderon v. Phuc Lam

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202120-15731California356 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROGELIO CALDERON, No. 20-15731

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:18-cv-04384-KAW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PHUC LAM, Prison Doctor; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted August 17, 2021***

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Rogelio Calderon appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. We review de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.