Raq Bey v. Jared Malec
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202120-16177California346 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAQ BEY, No. 20-16177
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-02626-SI
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DINO CRISTIANI; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
CITY OF EMERYVILLE,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Raq Bey appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bey’s request for oral argument, as set forth in the opening and reply briefs, is denied. U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an excessive force and other claims arising from a
traffic stop and arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…