Raq Bey v. Jared Malec

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202120-16177California346 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAQ BEY, No. 20-16177

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-02626-SI

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DINO CRISTIANI; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

CITY OF EMERYVILLE,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Raq Bey appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bey’s request for oral argument, as set forth in the opening and reply briefs, is denied. U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an excessive force and other claims arising from a

traffic stop and arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.