Martin Vogel v. Harbor Plaza Center, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202119-56141California860 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN VOGEL, No. 19-56141

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-04609-SJO-SH v.

HARBOR PLAZA CENTER, LLC, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 3, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Martin Vogel (“Vogel”) sued Harbor Plaza Center, LLC (“Harbor Plaza”)

for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the California

Disabled Persons Act, the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the California

Health and Safety Code. The district court granted in part Vogel’s motion for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). default…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.