Mark McCune v. Phh Mortgage Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202120-15839California344 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARK WADE McCUNE, No. 20-15839
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00525-CKJ
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Mark Wade McCune appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dougherty v. City of Covina, 654
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 892, 897 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.