Lorraine Patterson v. Carla Miller
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LORRAINE PATTERSON, No. 20-15860
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00321-NVW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CARLA MILLER; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Lorraine Patterson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendant child protective
services workers violated her constitutional rights in connection with state court
proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kohler v. Bed Bath & Beyond, LLC, 780 F.3d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir.…