Lorraine Patterson v. Carla Miller

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202120-15860California324 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORRAINE PATTERSON, No. 20-15860

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00321-NVW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CARLA MILLER; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Lorraine Patterson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendant child protective

services workers violated her constitutional rights in connection with state court

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kohler v. Bed Bath & Beyond, LLC, 780 F.3d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.