Brian Brown v. Barbara Von Blanckensee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202120-15750California388 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN L. BROWN, No. 20-15750

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00437-RCC-LCK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Brian L. Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see Alaimalo v. United

States, 645 F.3d 1042, 1047 (9th Cir. 2011), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Brown contends that the Bureau of Prisons violated his right to due process

and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.