Slosar

Slosar v. Pristine Surgery Center CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 2021F078687California5,059 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

Filed 8/24/21 Slosar v. Pristine Surgery Center CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

BRIAN SLOSAR,

F078687

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 16CECG02347) v.

PRISTINE SURGERY CENTER, INC. et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Rosemary T. McGuire, Judge. Accident, Injury and Medical Malpractice Attorneys of California and Daniel L. Carter, for Plaintiff and Appellant. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Scott M. Reddie and Daniel L. Wainwright, for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Appellant Brian Slosar (Slosar)1 sued respondents Pristine Surgery Center, Inc. and Prahalad B. Jajodia, M.D., (collectively, Pristine) for general negligence (viz., medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.