United States v. Ronald McCullough

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-30137California505 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30137

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00007-SMJ-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RONALD STEPHEN MCCULLOUGH,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Salvador Mendoza, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Ronald Stephen McCullough appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 108-month sentence for possession with

intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),

(b)(1)(B)(viii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). McCullough’s counsel has filed a brief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.