United States v. Juan Mendiola

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-30069California275 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30069

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:08-cr-00119-JKS-

v.

JUAN MANUEL MENDIOLA, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska James K. Singleton, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Juan Manuel Mendiola appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion for a sentence reduction under § 404 of the First Step Act of 2018. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Mendiola contends that the First Step Act allows for plenary resentencing on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). all eight counts of conviction because one of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.