Robert Dixon v. County of Sonoma

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-16620California376 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT DIXON, No. 20-16620

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-07137-EMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF SONOMA; ROBERT

GIORDANO,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Robert Dixon appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a policy of inadequate housing under the

Fourteenth Amendment while he was a pre-commitment civil detainee. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Jones v. Blanas, 393

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir. 2004). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.