Robert Dixon v. County of Sonoma
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-16620California376 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT DIXON, No. 20-16620
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-07137-EMC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF SONOMA; ROBERT
GIORDANO,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Robert Dixon appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a policy of inadequate housing under the
Fourteenth Amendment while he was a pre-commitment civil detainee. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Jones v. Blanas, 393
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir. 2004). We…