Richard Khan v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-16781California436 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD A. KHAN, No. 20-16781

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-03608-LHK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC;

PRESTIGE DEFAULT SERVICES, a California Corporation,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Richard A. Khan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his diversity action alleging California state law claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the basis of the applicable statute…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.