Neil Sorger v. Novartis Corp. Db&d Plan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-15224California2,351 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEIL SORGER, No. 20-15224

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00105-JSC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

NOVARTIS CORPORATION DEATH

BENEFIT & DISABILITY PLAN,

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of California Jacqueline Scott Corley, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 14, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: NGUYEN and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and BURGESS,* Chief District Judge.

Neil Sorger appeals from the district court’s order concluding that Novartis

Corporation Death Benefit and Disability Plan (the “Plan”) and Metropolitan Life

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.  The Honorable Timothy M. Burgess, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. Insurance Company (“MetLife,” and together, “Appellees”) did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.