Miguel Ilaw v. Lucy Koh
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-16553California238 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MIGUEL ILAW, No. 20-16553
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-03836-EMC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LUCY H. KOH, USDC, Judge,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Miguel Ilaw appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging civil rights violations stemming from Ilaw’s
employment discrimination lawsuit brought in 2011. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th…