Miguel Ilaw v. Lucy Koh

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-16553California238 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL ILAW, No. 20-16553

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-03836-EMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LUCY H. KOH, USDC, Judge,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Ilaw appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging civil rights violations stemming from Ilaw’s

employment discrimination lawsuit brought in 2011. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.