Miguel Ilaw v. Littler Mendelson, Pc
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-16964California273 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MIGUEL ILAW, No. 20-16964
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-03566-EMC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LITTLER MENDELSON, PC,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
JOSHUA ZELIG FELDMAN; KARIN
MORGAN COGBILL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Miguel Ilaw appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging civil rights violations stemming from Ilaw’s
employment discrimination lawsuit. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.