Michael Spengler v. Ttcf Eye Clinic
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-55990California324 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL R. SPENGLER, No. 20-55990
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-06892-DOC-SP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TTCF EYE CLINIC; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Michael R. Spengler appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the
filing fee after denying Spengler’s application to proceed in forma pauperis
(“IFP”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1052 (9th…