Joel Joseph v. American General Life Insuranc
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-56213California269 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOEL DAVID JOSEPH, No. 20-56213
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00831-GPC-DEB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Joel David Joseph appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his diversity action stemming from his father’s life insurance policy.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Cervantes v.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Joseph’s requests for oral argument, set forth in the opening and reply briefs, are denied. Countrywide Home…