Joel Joseph v. American General Life Insuranc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-56213California269 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOEL DAVID JOSEPH, No. 20-56213

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00831-GPC-DEB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Joel David Joseph appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his diversity action stemming from his father’s life insurance policy.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Cervantes v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Joseph’s requests for oral argument, set forth in the opening and reply briefs, are denied. Countrywide Home…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.