Colette Savage v. Mark Savage
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
COLETTE CLAIRE SAVAGE, No. 20-17297
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-07994-DMR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARK SAVAGE, Fiduciary/Trustee,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Donna M. Ryu, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted August 17, 2021***
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE , Circuit Judges.
Colette Claire Savage appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in
her diversity action challenging past Texas and California state court judgments.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Savage’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. We have jurisdiction under…