Colette Savage v. Mark Savage

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-17297California360 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

COLETTE CLAIRE SAVAGE, No. 20-17297

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-07994-DMR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARK SAVAGE, Fiduciary/Trustee,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Donna M. Ryu, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted August 17, 2021***

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE , Circuit Judges.

Colette Claire Savage appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in

her diversity action challenging past Texas and California state court judgments.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Savage’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. We have jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.