Brett Talmadge v. Dean Williams
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-36106California502 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRETT ALAN JAMES TALMADGE, No. 20-36106
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00318-TMB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DEAN WILLIAMS; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Brett Alan James Talmadge appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from
his ongoing probation revocation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. ReadyLink Healthcare, Inc. v. State Comp.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Ins. Fund, 754 F.3d 754, 758 (9th Cir. 2014) (dismissal…