Brett Talmadge v. Dean Williams

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-36106California502 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRETT ALAN JAMES TALMADGE, No. 20-36106

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00318-TMB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DEAN WILLIAMS; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Brett Alan James Talmadge appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from

his ongoing probation revocation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. ReadyLink Healthcare, Inc. v. State Comp.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Ins. Fund, 754 F.3d 754, 758 (9th Cir. 2014) (dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.