Arthur Ezor v. Maureen Duffy-Lewis
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-55706California395 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARTHUR EDWARD EZOR, No. 20-55706
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-09804-JVS-AGR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MAUREEN DUFFY-LEWIS; DOES,
through 10, inclusive,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Arthur Edward Ezor appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the judge presiding over his California state
court action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir.…