Arthur Ezor v. Maureen Duffy-Lewis

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202120-55706California395 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTHUR EDWARD EZOR, No. 20-55706

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-09804-JVS-AGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MAUREEN DUFFY-LEWIS; DOES,

through 10, inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Arthur Edward Ezor appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the judge presiding over his California state

court action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.