Little
Little v. University of California Medical Center
Opinion
Opinion
845 F.2d 1029 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joyce R. LITTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 84-6081. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 23, 1988. * Decided April 22, 1988. Before SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joyce Little appeals pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice of her Title VII complaint for failure to prosecute and the court's earlier dismissal without prejudice of four pendent state law claims. We affirm. DISCUSSION 3 1. Dismissal for lack of prosecution. 4 Little argues that the district court should have held a hearing and given her an opportunity to complete the pretrial order before dismissing her complaint for lack of prosecution. The district court may dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute in order to manage its affairs and "achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition…