Tokash

846 F.2d 1383 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph TOKASH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William FATTARSI, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-1577. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 24, 1988. * Decided May 4, 1988. Before NELSON, NOONAN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joseph Tokash, pro se and at present a prisoner, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 charging in his amended complaint that the public defender assigned to him, William G. Fattarsi, three prosecutors in the Sacramento County District Attorney's office, two California judges, six Sacramento police officers and a public defender acting for another defendant Hankins, had conspired to deprive him of rights guaranteed under the Sixth, Eighth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. The substance of his complaint was that while in custody he had been persuaded by police officers to be a filler in a lineup for Hankins who was suspected…