Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Charles Z. Wick, Director, United States Information Agency

Good Law
847 F.2d 502·1988 WL 47434·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6577
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 198886-6630California6,976 words

Opinion

Opinion

Poole, J.

This appeal is brought by the United States Information Agency (USIA), as the federal agency charged with the domestic administration of the Beirut Agreement, a multilateral treaty aimed at facilitating the international circulation of “educational, scientific and cultural” audio-visual materials. Under the treaty, qualifying materials receive various benefits, including exemption from import duties. A certificate of international educational character is a necessary prerequisite to the receipt of treaty benefits. Owners of American materials must apply to the USIA for such certificates. Plaintiffs-appellees are film makers, production and distribution companies and a membership association, all of whom have an interest in one or more films that were denied certification. In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that the regulations employed by the USIA to implement the treaty were unconstitutional. On a motion for summary judgment, the district court agreed, holding that three of the regulations are facially unconstitutional, in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments.

For reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I.

A.

The Beirut Agreement, the outgrowth of a proposal by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.