Christian Wagner and Rosemarie Wagner v. Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Ms. Dolphia Blocker, Mr. & Mrs. James Digby, Mr. & Mrs. William Frumovitz, Mr. & Mrs. Edward Gomoll, Mr. & Mrs. Brian Grazer, Ms. Eleanor Mirsky, Mr. Pernell Roberts, Ms. Kara Knack v. Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Gerald Breslauer, Trustee of the Pacific Coast Highway Security Trust, and Robert Ferguson v. Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Samuel and Carolyn Black, Stephen and Brigette Bosustow, Sumi Tatsui, Anthony and Hedy Stute v. Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency

Good Law
847 F.2d 515·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6689
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 198887-6108California4,371 words

Opinion

Opinion

847 F.2d 515 Christian WAGNER and Rosemarie Wagner, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DIRECTOR, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Defendant-Appellant. Ms. Dolphia BLOCKER, Mr. & Mrs. James Digby, Mr. & Mrs. William Frumovitz, Mr. & Mrs. Edward Gomoll, Mr. & Mrs. Brian Grazer, Ms. Eleanor Mirsky, Mr. Pernell Roberts, Ms. Kara Knack, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DIRECTOR, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Defendant-Appellant. Gerald BRESLAUER, Trustee of the Pacific Coast Highway Security Trust, and Robert Ferguson, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DIRECTOR, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Defendant-Appellant. Samuel and Carolyn BLACK, Stephen and Brigette Bosustow, Sumi Tatsui, Anthony and Hedy Stute, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DIRECTOR, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 87-6108. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 9, 1988. Decided May 20, 1988. Gregory C. Sisk, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant. Deborah J. Goldman, Lillick McHose & Charles, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.