William Myers, Jr. v. Leah Freed

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202120-17120California304 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM J. MYERS, Jr., No. 20-17120

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05683-SMB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LEAH SHAY FREED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

William J. Myers, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his motion to set aside the judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review for an abuse of a discretion. United States v. Estate of

Stonehill, 660 F.3d 415, 443 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Myers’s requests for oral argument, set forth in the opening and reply briefs, are denied.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.