William Myers, Jr. v. Leah Freed
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202120-17120California304 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM J. MYERS, Jr., No. 20-17120
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05683-SMB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LEAH SHAY FREED,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
William J. Myers, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying
his motion to set aside the judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review for an abuse of a discretion. United States v. Estate of
Stonehill, 660 F.3d 415, 443 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Myers’s requests for oral argument, set forth in the opening and reply briefs, are denied.…