Victor Samaniego v. Law Offices of Les Zieve Et. A

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR M. SAMANIEGO; BERTHA No. 20-56354

ALICIA SAMANIEGO,

D.C. No. 3:19-cv-01582-TWR- Plaintiffs-Appellants, BGS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LAW OFFICES OF LES ZIEVE ET. AL.; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Todd W. Robinson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Victor M. Samaniego and Bertha Alicia Samaniego appeal pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging federal and state law

claims arising from the foreclosure of their home. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under the Rooker-Feldman

doctrine.…