United States v. Jose Abundiz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202120-30171California433 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30171

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:16-cr-02066-RMP-

v.

JOSE ALBERTO ABUNDIZ, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Alberto Abundiz appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and his

motion for appointment of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). As an initial matter, the government contends that venue was improper in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.