United States v. Jose Abundiz
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202120-30171California433 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30171
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:16-cr-02066-RMP-
v.
JOSE ALBERTO ABUNDIZ, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2021**
Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Jose Alberto Abundiz appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying
his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and his
motion for appointment of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). As an initial matter, the government contends that venue was improper in…