Seberaino Jimenez v. Progressive Preferred Ins.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202120-15910California1,230 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SEBERAINO JIMENEZ, No. 20-15910
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01187-ROS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 9, 2021** Portland, Oregon
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Seberaino Jimenez appeals the district court’s grant of
summary judgment in favor of Progressive Preferred Insurance Company
(“Progressive”) on his breach of contract, bad faith, and consumer fraud causes of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). action. Jimenez also contends he is entitled to attorneys’ fees, and Progressive
contends it is entitled to…