Seberaino Jimenez v. Progressive Preferred Ins.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202120-15910California1,230 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEBERAINO JIMENEZ, No. 20-15910

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01187-ROS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 9, 2021** Portland, Oregon

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Seberaino Jimenez appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment in favor of Progressive Preferred Insurance Company

(“Progressive”) on his breach of contract, bad faith, and consumer fraud causes of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). action. Jimenez also contends he is entitled to attorneys’ fees, and Progressive

contends it is entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.