Prit Pal Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202120-70753California1,022 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PRIT PAL SINGH, AKA Pritpal Singh, No. 20-70753

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-187-040

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 6, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and LEE, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Prit Pal Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the denial of his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation. requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

Against Torture (“CAT”).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.