Pablo Espinoza Cornelio v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202114-72258California267 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PABLO ESPINOZA CORNELIO, No. 14-72258

Petitioner, Agency No. A092-203-262

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Pablo Espinoza Cornelio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977, 982 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for

review.

The agency…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.